Wednesday, January 18, 2023

Australia Rental affordability issues.

WELCOME TO OUR GENERAL BLOG YOU ARE INVITED. Here, we will post articles about world issues, Australian issues, Italian issues. And we will post also my personal life story articles. 


These days, on the rental market, there are a lot of properties for rent, some of them are very expensive, like the one in this photo, but there are also affordable properties for rent. People should look at what they can afford, so, try to be happy if you can afford one. 

Welcome to our blog, Australia Rental Affordability Issues.

Dear readers, this article of Australia rental affordability was written a few months ago, so, what you will find written here-under, is only the start of what is happening now. But let us start with what we find on the news and internet, to show you what we mean. So, hereunder is a shortened report.

 The latest property data from research firm CoreLogic reveals Brisbane has recorded a 3.8 per cent rise in housing rents in the three months to the end of September — the highest rise of any Australian capital city.

As Brisbane continues to face record low vacancy rates, rents have risen by 13.5 per cent state-wide in the past 12 months.

CoreLogic research director Tim Lawless said that equates to about a $68 a week increase for a typical rental dwelling, or $3,536 annually. (End of report).

Well, I hope you see what we mean. So, in this article, we want to discuss rental affordability, because they say that in Australia most people cannot find rental accommodation, and if they do, they cannot afford to pay for it. But what are the reasons for these days’ rental issues. It looks like that there are less property available for rent, but what could be the reason for this shortage, and what can be done to fix it.

Well, if the present government wants to fix it, they need to build more rental accommodation themselves, then rent them on low rent, perhaps at no profit at all or at a loss. But even if the government does that, will they be able to build enough rental property and solve the problem for good, I do not think they can do that, because that takes a lot of taxpayer money, and a lot of time to build enough rental properties, so, let us look at the reason why this is happening, and if anything has changed that has caused this shortage.

It looks like that in the past, when the rental property market was run from the private landlords, and there was some money to be made, these things did not happen very often, because a lot of small investors would invest on rental properties. But today there is very little profit in owning rental properties because they cost too much to run, and there are many taxes, starting from the local government, the state government, and from the federal government.

Because it is hard to make a profit, people that have money keep away from investing on rental properties. So, in this article let us try to find the reason this has happened and continue to happen. We want also discuss the reasons why in the past it was better.

---------------------------------

Let us talk about the rental past. 

Rental properties in the past were more affordable, because there were more small investors in the market, they were just people that had some money and instead of keeping it in the bank, they bought a rental property hoping that, when they retied, they could keep their affordable rental property rented, and they would be better off financially, in their old age, but today it does not work like that anymore.

Most of these people do not have enough money themselves, to become a self-funded retiree. So, they would rely on the government pension, for a modest living standard, but a lot of things have change, so, whoever is on a government pension, would be better off if they had no rental property at all.

Because there are a lot of overhead expenses to run the property. So, the small investors have stopped buying rental properties, since they give them lots of trouble and very little returns. So, what went wrong one may ask? Well, let us try to answer that question.

We all know that most economies are run on capitalism, this type of setting requires that you need to make more money from the money you have, this works out well, when everything works the way, it is supposed to work, and you know what you are doing. But sometimes it does not work that well. This happens when unforeseen expenses pop up, and at the same time the rental market goes down, so, there is no money to be made, the worst part is when you know that you cannot make enough money, to run your properties at a profit. 

Now, let us see why this has happened, who are the people that are interested in the rental market, and if there is a way to fix this rental shortage. I dare to suggest that the government may have to change some laws, that permits the landlords to run the properties at a small profit, because that is the only way to have enough properties in the market. Here I am not talking about the rich people that run large luxurious holdings and can make money, from their new units on high rent, because most people cannot afford that rent. So, we are looking for affordable rentals, that the workers or the pensioners can afford.

------------------------------

Let me state my views. 

I believe that there are two ways to fix the rental problem, one way is that the federal and state governments, build enough affordable rental themselves, and rent them at no profit or at a loss. The other way is to copy what we did in the past, because in the past there were more affordable rentals, since it was easier for small investors to have a property for rent, without losing money. Anyhow, what I am saying here is that we may have to go back and see what has changed, and if it is necessary, change it back the way it was before, since there were more affordable properties then.

Now we know that the private sector, can find ways how to supply all the rental properties required, but that must be done at a profit, so, the large companies are not interested to build affordable rentals, because there is not enough profit in them, then it is the small investors that can make the difference, and because there can be a lot of small investors that can be interested, if the laws permits them to have a rental property at a small profit, or as long as they do not lose other government entitlements, like the pension, then they could be interested to own a property for rent.

Now let me explain how it is possible to lose money. Small investor X lives in his own house and has a unit for rent, soon he is going to retire and hopes to receive the government pension, if he did not have the unit for rent, he would be intitled to receive the full pension, because the other assets he has, will take him past the limit he can have, before the pension is cut. But the unit is a real problem, because the net money he can make, is a lot less than the pension he loses, and that is the real problem, so, he believes that it was better if he did not have the unit. There are a lot of expenses to run a property, and a lot of problems. Today the last problem are the smoke alarms. Here the government makes laws that the landlords must employ a registered company to install the smoke alarms, but it does not say how much they are allowed to charge, so, they charge a lot, this can only make the rents dear.  

This is what the government should take into consideration. So, I dare to suggest that, if the government makes laws that the small investors can make a small profit from their rental properties, and the pensioners can make at least, as much money as the government pension cut, then the small investors may be willing to invest in residential units, and the problem can be half solved.

Anyhow, this is one of the reasons I can see, why this rental shortage is happening. I can write other examples that can explain better the rental situation. But I hope people understand what I am saying here. This is all I need to say about this rental affordability issues in Australia. 

To see more click on this link,  Australia Rental Affordability Issues.

---------------------------------------


Monday, January 2, 2023

World news diary, November December 2022.

WELCOME TO OUR GENERAL BLOG YOU ARE INVITED. Here, we will post articles about world issues, Australian issues, Italian issues. And we will post also my personal life story articles. 


The Melbourne Cup, is the most important horse race in Australia. It is so important that even horses from overseas are brought here to run the race. Anyhow, people follow this race, the horses run the race, while the ladies try who is best dressed.


Welcome to, World News and Views Diary, November 2022.

World news and views diary, November and December 2022

Dear readers, I am editing this article, and this diary will cover November and December 2022.Anyhow, the first Tuesday of November, in Australia they have a house race called the Melbourne Cup, it is like a feast, the ladies ware fancy dresses and hats, and everybody tries to have good time, it is like when in Europe they have, a saint patron feast in a town. Anyhow, there are several horse races run, and the most important one is the Melbourne Cup, there is a lot of money involved. Hereunder is how they are describing the race.

The Melbourne Cup is a Group 1 held over a distance of 3200 metres at Flemington Racecourse with total prizemoney of $7,750,000.

The Melbourne Cup was last run-on Tuesday, November 1st 2022, and won by Gold Trip.

The Melbourne Cup is Australia's most famous horse race held over a distance of 3200 metres at Flemington Racecourse in Melbourne. Held on the first Tuesday of November each year the ‘race that stops a nation' is an opportunity to try and back a winner and claim bragging rights over your friends, workmates, and family.

I say, thanks for the advice, but I am not a betting person, I will follow the race for fun, just to keep informed what is happening. Now let us look at more serious issues, that are affecting Australia.

Now above we have talked about the Melbourne Cup, a horse race that here in Australia everybody watches. But at the end of this month, for the people that follow sport, there something more important to watch, the FIFA soccer world cup in Qatar. It feels strange that a small nation has won the right to hold the games, but that how it is, and the games are starting right now while I am writing this article, let us hope that we can enjoy the games, and everything turn out all right, after all the entire world, will be following these games.

 

The FIFA. World soccer cup.

The soccer world games started in 1930 and are held every four years. Since then, the tournaments have been won 5 times from Brazil, 4 times from Germany and 4 times from Italy, since Italy has not qualified this time, we wonder who is going to win. At this moment, I am wondering, if the two top teams win again, or will somebody else win.

The games have started, but as it happens, there are people protesting, for different things that do not belong to the soccer games, just because they know that the entire world will be watching them but let us talk about the progress of the games.

Australia was unlucky, because they ended up playing France that has a strong team, so, we lost and the score was France 4 goals, Australia 1 goal. Another team to note is Germany, they had a bad start, they lost to Japan, Germany 1 goal, Japan 2 goals.

Anyhow, Today is the first of December, and Australia won last night soccer match, so, they have qualified for group 16, but how long they can last, I do not know, since there are very strong teams in these games, however, they can be proud for reaching this far, even if they do not qualify for next level.

Just as I thought the Australian was eliminated soon after, and to make a long story short, the final was between France and Argentina, and Argentina won the cup. I believe it is a good thing they won, because most people in Argentina are soccer crazy, so, they are going to have good time for a while. This is part of how they reported the final. (And I quote).

   Argentina are the world champions. From the moment Lionel Messi put the Copa America holders ahead in the 23rd minute of the 2022 FIFA World Cup final against France, Lionel Scaloni's side looked determined to deny the reigning champions as they survived a late comeback and penalties to storm to a stylish triumph in the first ever winter tournament in Qatar.

But there is also sad news. Soccer is a sport that most of the world follows, and the players are in the fan’s hearts, but today there are sad news, the great soccer player Pele has died, at the age of 82, and the soccer fan are mourning his loss. That is all about the soccer today.

------------------------------------------  

This is the world weather problems.

In Australia this year it has rained a lot, every day in the news we can see entire towns flooded, people evacuating, when they are told to do so, or trying their best to minimise the flood damage. They say that this is happening more often because of the global warming. All I can say about global warming, is that people talk about it a lot, but very little is being done.

Anyhow, this month of November 2022 has been as bad as last month, it has rained a lot, as you can see from this report, I have pasted hereunder.   

 Waves of heavy rainfall left vast areas of eastern Australia under water in October 2022. By the month’s end, swollen rivers flooded landscapes from southern Queensland and New South Wales to northern Victoria.

Flooding in New South Wales and along the border in Queensland is visible in this false-color image (right) acquired on October 29, 2022, with the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on the Suomi NPP satellite. Water appears light to dark blue. Vegetation is green and bare land is brown. For comparison, the VIIRS image on the left shows the same area on September 18, 2022, prior to the month of heavy rain.

The flooding visible in the October 29 image occurred along permanent and impermanent rivers and streams located about 500 kilometers (300 miles) northwest from the coastal city of Sydney. They are part of the Murray-Darling basin, which includes Australia’s longest system of rivers. The basin saw its wettest October on record in 2022, according to news reports. Rainfall totals across the basin neared 150 millimeters—four times the average for the month and well above the previous record from 1950.

Anyhow, I hope that one day, we can go back to normal.

------------------------------------------  

 

The world of politics these days.

There have been a few changes lately. Italy has now a new government, the party called Fratelli D’Italia, is the most popular party, so, Giorgia Meloni the leader has become the new prime minister of Italy.

In England, the prime minister has changed two time lately, after Liz Truss replaced Boris Jonson, she lasted only 44 days, then she was replaced by Rishi Sunak, this time we hope it can last long enough until next election.

In USA, the midterm election has had mixed result, so, everything is about the same, Donald Trump hopes were not realised, but he still wants to run for the WHITE HOUSE in 2024, so, he is saying a few strange things, about the election being stolen, see what I found on the internet, about presidential speeches. (And I quote)     

Great Moments In Presidential Speeches: FDR: "We have nothing to fear, but fear itself." JFK: "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." Donald Trump: "They stole the electron." (This Tweet brought via the old David Letterman show)

But I must say that Donald Trump can be a good president, because these days we need a strong man as president, even if sometimes his ways are strange. You see, today I am wondering, what would Donald Trump have done, to stop Putin to make war on Ukraine, he delt with the president of North Korea in a strange way, but in the end, everything was better.

This is all I can say in this last article of this year 2022. 


See you next year, and I wish you a happy new Year. 

To see more click on this link, World News and Views Diary, November 2022.


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

The Social Security Must be made equal.

WELCOME TO OUR GENERAL BLOG YOU ARE INVITED. Here, we will post articles about world issues, Australian issues, Italian issues. And we will post also my personal life story articles. 


In Australia, people can go to the government Centrelink office, where they can apply for their pension, or their unemployment benefits. This social security system helps people in need, so, people can receive payments from the government. In this article here, we want to point out that there are some anomalies in the system, that stops some people to receive this money. 

The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

The Australian Social Security Must be equal. 

Looking for a better security system

Welcome to our article, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

Dear readers, in this blog we are looking for a better social security system, where everybody gets a minimum payment, which is equal to the minimum pension or unemployment benefit.

Because, we believe that the Australian Social Security System must be equal for everybody, but it is not, as we have said in our previous articles, which had something to do with the Australian social security system, starting with, Farming Today Is Still a Risky Business, then, Australian Social Security, then, The Australian Parties, then, Australia can do better than this, and then, The Assets Test Dilemma, now in these articles we were talking about how the Australian Social Security System works and helps people. So, we have found that the Australian social security system, is good but not perfect, since some people cannot receive help from the government for one reason or another; therefore, the social security system needs to be changed, to fix these unforeseen failures to help. Australia cannot claim to have a good social security system, when it fails to deliver help to those that need help.

Having said that, now we need to study the situation and suggest a solutuion to this social problem, because, the Australian Social Security system, must be equal for everybody. We believe that everybody in the community must be given a minimum of help, when they need help. So, we are going to write and suggest our views, hoping that somebody important reads them and does something about it.

Now, what we want to write here is not going to be popular, because it criticises the existing social security system, since it says that it is not good enough, they need to avoid what is happening to the farmers, so, they must put in place a better system, where people in need are helped. So, let us imagine and talk about a social security system that can guaranty that.

----------------------------

Talking about the ideal social security setup. 

What we are writing hereunder is an idealistic way for the social security system to adapt, if they can. I said if they can, because it is unlikely that this system can be approved now, because Australia cannot afford it today, however, it is important that something like this exists. We hope that future politicians, start working on this idealistic social security system that we are talking about.

We believe that all legal citizen that are unemployed or don’t have any income, must be granted from the government an amount of money that is at least equal to the minimum government unemployment benefit or pension, it would be like receiving a small wage from the government. Now, we believe that this is what is needed in Australia, and we believe that one day can be done, if we can organise ourselves to achieve that, after all Australia is a rich country, so, we should be able to do that. I know that it is going to cost a lot more than we can afford, but if it is well planned, it can be done. Now let us see how this will affect the community and which group of people will benefit from this change.

---------------------------------

The people that can benefit from the change. 

The people that will benefit from this change, are those people that today don’t receive any payment from the government, and those people that don’t receive enough, so, they are forced to live below the poor threshold. In this case the poor threshold is set, as equal to the minimum government pension that today is about, $900 per fortnight for a single person, or $700 each for a couple. This is the minimum of money that people need to live, and we believe that it must be equal for everyone.

As things stand today, there are people that must live with less than the minimum government pension, because of the anomalies in the system. One of those anomalies is caused from the assets test, where the pensioners receive a smaller pension, the rest of their earnings is supposed to come from their assets, which are supposed to earn about 7.8 %; but most of the rental properties, can only earn about 2.5 to 3%, as we have shown you in our previous article, The Assets Test Dilemma, where a house valued at $650,000 did only make $8500 in a year, which is about 1.3%. So, we believe that the assets test on rental properties must be set according to what they can earn, if the government believes that we need mums and dads to invest in rental properties and keep the Australian real estate market the way it is today.

You see, we need people that want to invest in rental properties, but they are becoming aware that to own a second house, can be a problem when they apply to receive their pension, because the assets test will reduce their pension more than what they can earn from their assets; once the people know that they cannot make any money from rental properties, they will stop investing in rental properties. 

My views are that the assets test on rental properties, must be set at a level, where it is possible for the owners, to earn at least as much as they loose from the pension. Now my views are that the assets test on rental properties should be one third of what they are now, so that the pensioners will lose one dollar per thousand, instead of three dollars per thousand. But even this might not be enough, you see if you have a property valued at one million dollars, you cannot receive any pension. The question here is; will this property earn the owner about $24,000 per year net. I don’t think so. Anyhow, these are our views.

-----------------------------

The property owners’ other problems. 

As we have seen in this article and our previous articles, to own a rental property is a problem and not a benefit, because people lose their pension or unemployment benefits, so, to own a second property is not the way we should plan for better retirement, since the assets test reduces the pension payments to more than what you can earn from your properties.

But there are more negative things in owning a rental property, the worst of all is the land-tax. The land-tax in Queensland is $1.7 per thousand, this means that if you have land valued it one million dollars, every year you must pay $17,000 to the government just because you own this land. They don’t give you anything at all, you just must pay, because they need the money.

Some people still believe in owning properties, because their price go up all the time, so, they think that they are better off having properties, you see, they don’t realize that there is this gain tax that will take away all their earnings and more, let me give you this example.

You own a rental house that you have bought several years ago for $250,000, which was the right market price, today you must sell the rental house, because you need to move to another town, where houses are about the same value, so, you think that it will be easy; you sell the house for $650,000 and you buy another one about the same price. But that is not going to happen, because the $400,000 dollars that you have gained is taxable. This is called the gain tax, which may well be around $100,000, it is hard to be more specific. So, in this case you may lose $100,000 dollars because of the gain tax.

The figures in this article, might not be correct, but they are close enough to what they are supposed to be for showing our readers.

This is all I can say today; this setup is not fair for anybody that owns properties, because those properties in the assets test, cannot earn half the money that they will receive from the government pensions or other benefits, if they had no properties. So, for them it would have been better to have no properties; since the assets test affects the pension and other benefit adversely, starting from the farmers, as we have said in, Farming Today Is Still a Risky Business.

So, people are discouraged to own properties and to save for rainy day, because there is no benefit to own them, since they are going to lose and not to gain. Here we are asking for a chance that the scale in the assets test for properties, be set in a way that gives the property owners a chance to earn at least as much money as they lose, from the government benefit. It is not fair that people lose money because they have worked hard and saved money.

Now we are talking about money, so, if you have money instead of a property, today you are not better off, because the interest that you can receive from the bank, is not equal to the money you lose from your pension. 

Anyhow, this is all what I can think about today. I believe that at least I have pointed out what in my views needs adjustment. Because we believe that, the Australian social security system must be equal for everybody.

I hope that somebody in the government reads my articles, and then thinks what can be done to make them fair for those people that have worked hard.

See you in next article, World News and My Views, May 2022 Diary.

To see more click on this link, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

------------------------ 


Tuesday, November 8, 2022

The Assets Test Problem.

WELCOME TO OUR GENERAL BLOG YOU ARE INVITED. Here, we will post articles about world issues, Australian issues, Italian issues. And we will post also my personal life story articles. 


In Australia if you need help from the government, you can apply for help, but you should pass the assets test, because what you own can affect the government help. While this sounds fair to most people, it may not be the right thing to do. Because it may descriminate againest people that are poor, even though they own properties.   


Welcome to our article, The Assets Test Problem

How the assets test affects property owners. 

Dear readers, today it rains a lot, but a couple of years ago there was a drought, and the farmers were having problems to survive, because of the drought, so, we thought that the Australian government should help. But they cannot help the farmers, because they own properties and the assets test exclude them from government help; it is like other property owners that are excluded also. This is what we are going to write in this article.

I believe that we have suggested that the farmers, with some government help, need to make something like a collective farming association, where all the farmers can pool a percentage of their farming products and money, which should be tax free from the government, then this pool can be used to help each other when they need help.

We hope that somebody high up reads our suggestion and then do something about it, we hope they do. We also noted that the farmers cannot ask help from the government, because they are self-employed and because they have properties, so, their property are assets that stops them from receiving help from the government.

The assets test is a real problem in Australia, because it is hard to know, at what level is the right level to apply it, as we will see as we continue to write about it; but that is only part of the farmers problem, because also they cannot ask any government assistance since they are self-employed. But when one cannot make money for a long time, and here in the case of the farmers we are talking about years, I think that it would be fair to help them. But the farmers are not the only people that are affected from these government rules of the assets test, because there are other groups of people that are affected adversely as well.     

Anyhow, today beside talking about the farmers, we are going to talk about the assets test for other groups, and above all, how it affects rental property owners in a more detailed way than we have done in our other articles, and then, about other unfair government taxes levied on properties. 

 

The assets test punishes rental properties owners. 

The assets test is a problem for the pensioners, because it does not consider, if it is possible to earn the same amount of money that will be cut off the pension. The main problem here is that, when the treasurer makes the budget, he doesn’t even look at this possible outcome, he just wants to save money and cut the pensions. In fact, nobody is thinking about this negative issue, I would say that the entire population thinks that people that own rental properties are rich people, so, they don’t need the government pension, when rental houses are a real problem with pensioners,because if they get a government pension, the pension will be cut off so drastically that they would have been better off, if they didn’t have the house at all. I believe that the assets test on rental properties, is set three time as much as it should be for the small property owner to break even,. The other problem that could come from these decisions, is that in the future there will be less rental property available. 

Anyhow, before I write about that, I am going to suggest that to fix this injustice about today assets test, which discriminate heavily against the small rental property owners, since they are in a disadvantaged position financially, the only thing that comes to my mind is that whoever makes these budgets, must keep in mind that he should give these properties owner a fair go, if he wants to keep the Australian economy going the best way possible, or I should say, at least as good as it was a few years ago, before the assets was changed.

The aim is to achieve the most benefit for the country, I believe that to achieve you need people that are self-starter and work hard, like the small property owners that have worked hard during their lives and have paid their taxes on what they have earned. They saved some money and invested it on a second house, hoping that when they would retire, they could be better off financially, but it did not work the way they wanted, because of the unfair assets test changes that the Australian government has made recently. 

Here I can only say; what is wrong with the people in Canberra? Don’t they see that they are killing the will of the people that want to progress by working hard? This is the second most important group of people that work physically hard; the first group is the workers that work for a wage. This first group of people politically belongs to the Labour Party, these people are happy to work for a fair wage, and if they own their house they live in, so, they are not self-starters.

The second group of people, the small property owners that are usually hard-working people and self-starters can belong to both parties; so, if the coalition wants more votes from this group and stay in government, they need to fix the mistakes they have made, when they changed the assets test in a way that punishes severally anyone that gets a government pension. I say punishes them severally, as I am going to show you, how the assets test and other things discriminate against the pensioners, so, it makes life very hard for them. Anyhow, read my views about the assets test that discriminate against the small property owners, in the example I am writing hereunder.

 -------------------------

 

The assets test punishes small property owners. 

Now let us talk about how today assets test punishes financially the small property owners. To show you that, hereunder we have written an example. So, we have chosen a couple that we call Mr. and Mrs Smith, they are both pensioner and receive a government pension. The figure that appears in this example are all rounded figures, but they are close to the real figures.

Now, let us write this example

Mr Don Smith and his wife are both on government pensions, but today they don’t get much pension, because of the assets test. The Smith couple thinks that, the only way one could describe today assets test is that whoever made these laws are cruel people, because the assets test discriminates against those small property owners that own a house for rent, since it is not possible to live on the money that their property can earn, so, let us see how it works. One of the problems exist because of the deeming setup, where the government calculate that people can earn $3.00 per fortnight per every thousand dollars you have in the bank, or anywhere else including properties. In fact, owning properties is the worst thing you can have, because it affects the owners in a disadvantaged way, like the Smiths that we are talking about here

The house they rent is valued at $650,000, plus a few more belongings their assets test are nearly 800,000 dollars so, they only get about $100 per fortnight each, because of the assets test.

Now, if they didn’t have their rental property, they would get the full pension, which would have been, $690 each per fortnight each.

Now, let us try to calculate how much the Smiths can earn from their rental property in Brisbane. This property is an old three-bedroom house, on a large block of land that is valued at $550,000, this house is rented at $450.00 PW, so, if they are lucky and the house is rented the entire year, they would collect $23400.00 this is before expenses.

Now, what are the average expenses for this house; The Brisbane City Council rates are $600.00 per quarter; the Urban Utilities average $450.00 per quarter; this will come to $4200.00 per year; the insurance is $1200.00 per year, the land tax (this may vary, but let us say that they have to pay it fully in this example) so, the tax is $6550.00; maintenance can vary, but let us say $1500.00, then there is the fee for the real estate agent say $1500.00 per year.

Let us add this numbers up. So, $4200 to Brisbane city Council rates and water +1200 insurance+6550 Queensland government land tax +1500 maintenance+ 1500 to real estate agent letting fee, it = $14,950

Calculate total net earnings for the year, is $23400 income, minus14950 expenses, this leaves only $8450 net earnings. 

The Smiths have made $8450 net in one year. Do you think they can live on that? Here some people may say that not everybody pays the land-tax, but even without the land-tax, the Smiths will only earn $15,000.00 from their rental property.

This is a lot less than if they were on the government pension, which would have been nearly $36000.00 for both.

But now they only get 20,200.00 at the best, and all the trouble to rent their property.

I believe that these negative things must not happen, it is not right when you have worked hard to put yourself in a better financial position, then suddenly you find yourself worse off. Because some government idiots have made this huge mistake.

I believe that these mistakes must be fixed from the government, if they don't the people that have been hurt will vote them out of government. The future generations, will not invest in properties, so, there will not be enough properties for rent. 

Well, somehow, I have had my say, and I hope that it is clear enough what I have said. So, see you in my next article, which will be about, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

To see more click on this link, The Assets Test Problem

See you soon.

------------------------------------